NASA Gold Anniversary: The Right Stuff?

Is Buzz Aldridge in the picture? Apparently, he is been known to leave public events in tears if probed on the reality or otherwise of the moon landing.

The moon landing was obviously a fake:

Motivation: The Cold War -- and the USSR has just put Sputnik in space -- which was a huge coup for communism. As it is the only evidence of Armstrong and Aldridge setting foot on the moon are photos and videos.

Why didn't they light magnesium flares on the moon surface which would have been visible to the naked eye from earth? That would have been a huge PR coup -- after all there was no other reason Kennedy put 40 billion dollars into this program other than publicity.

Will that conspiracy theory never die? There is no real evidence of it.

Oh man ... just Google it and check it for yourself.

1. The flag is fluttering. Armstrong's golf shot slices. Yet there is no atmosphere on the moon.

2. There is no direct video feed provided. Networks had to shoot video from a TV -- so the video images are all blurred. Yet hundreds of photos, apparently taken by the astronauts themselves, are all professional quality. Nothing blurred or over exposed.

3. There are clearly multiple light soures and shadows with the flag lit up -- yet the moon has only one light source -- the sun.