The first open media site where anyone can report from anywhere

Report Your News

Is Obama's Presidency Being Set Up for Failure?

Washington : DC : USA | about 1 month ago
2 2
Views: 621
Obama Presidency
<%>

History was made on November 4, as Barack Obama stood in front of thousands of approving supporters at Grant's Park in Chicago, acknowledging his victory and becoming America's first black President-elect.

But while his electoral win was certainly historic, there is much to live up to in the future. And with the news media and voters projecting such high expectations of the new president, it begs the question as to whether his tenure is already being set up for failure.

Within a few hours after Obama's victory speech November 4, Twitter users not happy with the results began the only response they apparently could - set the Obama Presidency up for such high expectations he couldn't possibly come out ahead.

Comments like "We'll be watching now", and "Just see what happens in a couple of years when he can't keep his promises." Republicans, angered by such a resounding defeat, have since continued to point to potential frailties in Obama's every move, and seem to be trying to link the terrible economic circumstances to an Obama Presidency through association. One Twitter account, the day after the election, kept referring to the "Obama recession" despite the obvious fact that Obama had just been elected and had nothing to do with the economic downturn personally or professionally.

So the question now is, is the Obama Presidency being set up for failure no matter what it tries to do? Or, will it be like an Abraham Lincoln Presidency, when everyone expected him to fail, and instead he became one of the best presidents this country has ever seen?

My guess is no matter what the political pundits think, the answer lies with the voters, an awfully fickle lot by any standard. Although the election is over, the role of the American electorate is not. Future voter support could make or break an Obama presidency.

First, Obama must act quickly and decisively, but he must also be careful not to appear to be trying to take over before his January 20 inauguration, when his term will officially begin. Although voters are expecting and hoping for immediate action, their support during the transition will help Obama avoid taking responsibility for decisions that are still in the control of the lame duck George Bush presidency.

Second, Obama must walk a tight rope while making judicious yet politically savvy cabinet appointments. Slots at the top of the ladder are especially significant. Obama's challenge is to surrounding himself with the intellectual muscle he needs to get significant change accomplished quickly, but to be careful not to appoint too many white men, or two many black men, or too many men in general. Not an easy order to fill. It would be easy to alienate a sector of his electoral support if they feel his appointments are not fairly distributed.

Lastly, Obama has some high expectations to live up to. His landslide election was not a chance happening, it was a mandate from American voters to get things moving, quickly! In fact polls indicate that 45% of voters expect the Obama presidency to act quickly and decisively, no doubt leaving little room for mistakes. How critically the voters hold him to their expectations could make or break the success of his presidency in the future.

The challenges that face Obama's team are as unique as the historic circumstances of his election. The team must address a unique combination of issues that no American president has ever seen. The future of Obama's presidency relies as much upon what Obama's team does, as it does upon those who elected him. If voters stick behind Obama, through better or worse, there is a good chance his Presidency will provide many more historic moments, but without this support, his chances of succeeding will be far more limiting.

  • Posted By therestillis | about 1 month ago | Spam
    I have often wondered during the Presidential campaign certain things that have led me to believe that MAYBE the Power in Office, (I don't want to say Republicans because that seems to be a front.) wanted Obama to win.
    First of all the money - with the DOW doubled even in it's lowest point the past 8 years there was more than enough profits by the top 10% income earners to filter much more money into the GOP campaign than the DNC raised. Are they too cheap to part with it or was it just not necessary?
    Second - the Palin (populist) nomination. For so many reasons I believe that was a calculated purposeful goof or just really blatant arrogance. After watching the Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute's latest press conference on CSPAN, superciliousness attributes are alive within the (I can't call them conservatives because truly they are not) desperate for a purpose wannabe populists.
    Third - John McCain's campaign was not about a centerist canidate that ran in 2000. The campaign did not have quite the Karl Rove touch or else Karl Rove has gone over the edge because the GOP campaign seemed to have inspired the opposition to the Rush Limbaugh type of rhetoric.
    Reason why Obama was slated to win. Alan Greenspan had once made a remark about how there is a large bubble in the middle class that will pop and there will be a scream heard around the world. The reason to make the bubble and allow it to pop is so that Americans will become happier to be poorer and accept immigration easier when the aliens are on the same level economically. A general plan of the top 10% to curb anarchy and their so-called peace plan for after the battle.
    There are more reasons, however, we will see what events happen in the near future and how we will be tested.
    Perhaps there is just the anger from the "Good Ole White Boys" group that has found that the world is changing away from their principals and they are lashing out. Afterall, with our BFF, the internet, all voices can be heard.
  • Posted By onlinebusinesswoman | about 1 month ago | Spam
    WOW! I can see you've thought about this for a while hehe. I think there is some merit to some of your points, however I'll have to disagree that the Obama win was a conservative/Repub conspiracy. The reason - McCain is far too proud to have thrown in the towel for any party! Instead, I think McCain wanted to win so badly that he thought he had to throw everything at the election hoping something would stick. This desperation showed through, most especially after the Palin pick.

    Right after the RNC, I think McCain felt there'd be a certain chance he could win it (I thought he had a better chance before the Palin pick, but I guess he didn't). However, I believe that after the Couric and other interviews, McCain realized what a mistake the Palin pick was, and at that point, he really didn't care much anymore. Maybe, in his own twisted way, he was trying to protect the country he loves by making sure he and Palin weren't elected (though I don't truly believe that either).

    I think desperation, bad management, and bad luck (economic conditions) created the situation. Although Democrats may wish Repubs had won a few years from now if the economy doesn't get better, in the end, no party ever wants to give up the shot at Presidency.
  • Posted By muslimindia | about 1 month ago | Spam
    i think in my humble view, the guy is creating an aura of too much expectations all around and to add to that he is clearly in the red as far as picking of right people for the right job. Once again instead of change is it is change you can xerox.
    I particularly see a pattern now.
    arif

Enter your comment below

Reported by onlinebusinesswoman

Related Allvoices Contributions

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @1807215

Most Popular Reports

Related People

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© allvoices, Inc 2008. All rights reserved.
SVN INFO: