The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Climate Change And The Mystery Of The Shrinking Sheep

Wales : United Kingdom | 4 months ago  
1 0
Views: 496
  • Climate Change And The Mystery Of The Shrinking Sheep
    Climate Change And The Mystery Of The Shrinking Sheep
    Posted by: RaulDeSouza
    Climate Change And The Mystery Of The Shrinking Sheep
Climate Change And The Mystery Of The Shrinking Sheep

Milder winters are causing Scotland's wild breed of Soay sheep to get smaller, despite the evolutionary benefits of possessing a large body, according to new research.
The new study provides evidence for climate change as the cause of the mysterious decrease in the size of wild sheep on the Scottish island of Hirta, first reported by scientists in 2007. The researchers believe that, due to climate change, survival conditions on Hirta are becoming less challenging, which means slower-growing, smaller sheep are more likely to survive the winters than they once were. This, together with newly-discovered so-called 'young mum effect' whereby young ewes produce smaller offspring, explains why the average size of sheep on the island is decreasing.

Classical evolutionary theory suggests that over time the average size of wild sheep increases, because larger animals tend to be more likely to survive and reproduce than smaller ones, and offspring tend to resemble their parents. However, among the Soay sheep of Hirta, a remote Scottish island in the St Kilda archipelago, average body size has decreased by approximately 5% over the last 24 years.

The research team analysed body size and life history data, which records the timing of key milestones throughout an individual sheep's life, for Soays on Hirta over this 24 year period. They found that sheep on the island are not growing as quickly as they once did, and that smaller sheep are more likely to survive into adulthood. This is bringing down the average size of sheep in the population over all.

Professor Coulson suggests that this is because shorter, milder winters, caused by global climate change, mean that lambs do not need to put on as much as weight in the first months of life to survive to their first birthday as they did when winters were colder.

He explains: "In the past, only the big, healthy sheep and large lambs that had piled on weight in their first summer could survive the harsh winters on Hirta. But now, due to climate change, grass for food is available for more months of the year, and survival conditions are not so challenging - even the slower growing sheep have a chance of making it, and this means smaller individuals are becoming increasingly prevalent in the population."

Their results suggest that the decrease in average body size seen in Hirta's sheep is primarily an ecological response to environmental changes over the last 25 years; evolutionary change has contributed relatively little.

In addition, the research team also discovered that the age at which a female sheep gives birth affects the size of her offspring. They realised that young Soay ewes are physically unable to produce offspring that are as big as they themselves were at birth. This 'young-mum' effect had not been incorporated into previous analyses of natural selection, which explains in part why the sheep of Hirta are defying biologists' expectations.

"The young mum effect explains why Soay sheep have not been getting bigger, as we expected them to," concludes Professor Coulson, "But it is not enough to explain why they're shrinking. We believe that this is down to climate change. These two factors are combining to override what we would expect through natural selection."

The research was carried out in collaboration with scientists from the Universities of Leeds, Cambridge, Edinburgh and Stanford. It was funded in the UK by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC).

News Stories
 >
  • News Source: Androscoggin News | 3 months ago
    Like the wool sweater that emerges from the dryer a size too small, global warming seems to be shrinking sheep. On average, wild Soay sheep on Scotland's island Hirta are 5 percent smaller today than they were in 1985, according to a team of...
  • News Source: Uinta County News | 4 months ago
    Evolution and climate change Survival of the less fit Jul 3rd 2009 From The Economist print edition The mystery of Scotland’s shrinking sheep may have been solved ON THE remote island of Hirta, in the St Kilda archipelago beyond the Outer Hebrides,...
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: silverscorpio.com
    Washington, July 3 (ANI): A new study has provided evidence for climate change as the cause of the mysterious decrease in the size of wild sheep on the. ... This, together with the newly discovered so-called 'young mum effect' whereby young ewes
  • Blog Source: www.tgdaily.com
    The researchers believe that, due to climate change, survival conditions are becoming less challenging, with less snow and more rain. This means slower-growing, smaller sheep are more likely to survive the winters than they once were. This, together
  • Blog Source: www.greenbang.com
    Add to the ever-growing list of emerging signs of climate change ... shrinking sheep. Yes, Scotland's wild sheep are apparently becoming smaller as warmer. ... In addition, the research team also discovered that the age at which a female sheep gives
  • Blog Source: scienceblogs.com
    The group wanted to work out the extent to which the sheep's shrinking size is due to the influence of natural selection and to what extent it is just an ecological response to changing environments. To that end, they developed a ...
Images
 >
 
Videos
 >
 
Posted By birdpond birdpond | 4 months ago
Very interesting report
Posted By aquamarina217 aquamarina217 | 4 months ago
Climate change is causing so many different evolutionary and scientific changes in the world. I have read so many articles in the past about what climate change has altered, but I haven't been keeping a running list. I'm starting with this one.


A big problem with climate change altering our already limited set knowledge of evolutionary behavior such as that of the benefits of larger sheep in Hirta is that humans are changing the balance of the natural world. We won't be able to predict events that would likely occur in science anymore because, as this article points out, the evolutionary benefits of larger sheep is reversing now as seen with the proliferation of smaller offsprings.


Of course, when the article states that the decrease in average size of these sheep is an "ecological response to environmental changes", one could argue that over the past millions of years, the environment has been changing and creatures have been evolving and responding to such changes in the environment. My reply, however, would be that those have been natural, scientific changes that the earth and nature have created over time. We, however, are emitting chemicals unknown to mother nature and speeding up changes in the world. At least, that's what I believe upon hearing what little I have learned about global warming and such. If someone knows more about this topic, I'd be very excited and appreciative to hear what you have learned!


So, will the increase in the smaller sheep population along with the larger sheep population pose a problem? Of course, eventually the smaller sheep who will be more "fit" to survive as Darwinian theory suggests will thus overcome the existence of the larger sheep in Scotland, so in the long run, I guess any problem wrought by the competing sheep populations will be fixed.


I have a question, however. Why is the young mum effect taking place now? Why all of a sudden are ewes getting pregnant earlier than usual?
Posted By mllovric mllovric | 4 months ago
More mutton chops for your dinner table. 5/7/2009.
Posted By ahol888 ahol888 | 4 months ago
If evolution is true, then the sheep would still continue to become larger no matter what the environment was. The opposite of evolution is decomposition; the height of the sheep is decomposing instead of evolving into a larger height. That is why Darwin recanted every theory he created about evolution on his deathbed. If evolution was true, nobody would die and decompose, every person would evolve when disease and old age attempted to attack the body. For example, fossils of Neanderthals were found to be as large as twelve feet tall. However, there are no longer any people on this earth that are twelve feet tall. The human race is now smaller than those who were on the earth. That is the opposite of evolution. If evolution is true, then why does an apple rot after a person bites into it? The apple should be able to evolve to keep its flesh fresh. As I said before, that is why Darwin recanted everything about the theory of evolution on his deathbed. Also, if evolution was true, it should have been proven to be a law in science by now. It has been 200 years since his death. It is still a theory because there have not been any experiments from planned hypotheses that have proven that evolution is true. I saw the National Geographic piece on the missing link that was on a month ago. That is great; they found one. However, for evolution to be proven as true, then thousands of other links have to be found for every species in the animal kingdom now. Sorry to be long-winded. I quote Brady Quinn, "Now I'm done."
Posted By mllovric mllovric | 4 months ago
aho1888, You are correct and it is exactly the way things are. The truth
is Darwin was dead wrong or he would not have recanted his ideas. He also
wasn't very popular in the church because they denounced him as a heretic
teaching Satanism. 6/7/2009.
Reported by RaulDeSouza
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @3600096

Most Popular Reports

Contributions

Help and Accounts


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.